Intelligent Design vs. Creationism
an interpretation from religious authority, whereas intelligent design is an
inference from biological and physical, cosmological evidence,” Meyer noted of
the differences between the two belief systems. “One starts from data of the natural world,
one starts from Scripture.”
possible to formulate a case for intelligent design in a strictly scientific
manner,” Meyer said. “When we think
about the origin of information, it always arises from an intelligent
is a “hieroglyphic inscription, a paragraph in a book, or
information embedded in a radio signal, whenever you find information, you
trace it back to its source, you always come to a mind not a process,” Meyer
the issue, Meyer, who wrote a Ph.D. on the “origin of life problem” at
Cambridge University, said that by using the Darwinian method of reasoning, he
“came to a different, non-Darwinian conclusion — that there is evidence of
Can intelligent design be proven wrong?
Christians, the creation question is a big one. Indeed, while there is a split over the
mechanics of how our world came about, all believers would assert that God was,
somehow, the creative force behind the world we now live in. With that in mind, is there any chance that a
creator could actually be disproved?
have to find an undirected process that was capable of producing information
beyond a threshold that we have defined mathematically,” Meyer explained,
adding that this would entail information arising “by chance, based on the
probable resources of the universe.”
however, is unlikely to happen, because intelligent design posits that only
“intelligence is capable of generating the amount of information needed for these
big jumps in biological complexity in the history of life.” Indeed, for Christians, this intelligence or
“mind,” would be equated to an infinite being — namely, God.
More agreement than people realise.
In terms of
the congruity between religion and science, Meyer said that “there is far
more agreement than people realize.
universe had a beginning — this is one of the first words of the
Biblical texts, that there was a beginning,” he noted. “That’s a point of agreement on the same
In terms of
the assertions made in the theory of intelligent design, there is also
agreement with the Bible.
design is telling us that life and the universe were designed — that’s also
something you would find affirmed in the theistic religious traditions,” Meyer
added. “There are overlapping areas of
interest, and increasingly, what we’ve found is that there is increasing
agreement as we’ve understood the science better.”
The scientific problem with atheism
often billed as the most logical form of non-belief system for any devoted and
rigorous scientist. However, Meyer says
that the atheist rejection of intelligent design presents many key scientific
Darwinian view is not just the idea of evolution over time, but an undirected,
unguided process that produces the appearance, but not the reality, of design,”
he explained. Atheists, however, see nature as a “self-creating entity
that can produce all the wonders and intricacies of living organisms without
any guiding hand whatsoever.”
this is difficult to comprehend and is the key reason why so many Christians,
and scientists, support the theory of intelligent design as a way to
accommodate a belief in creator God.
mathematics professor and internationally renowned scientist, John C. Lennox,
is just one of those who advocates intelligent design theory. Lennox, also a committed Christian and the
uncle of famed worship songwriter, Kristyn Getty, argued the case for
intelligent design in his book “Seven Days That Divide the World.”
majority of those who have reflected deeply and written about the origin and
nature of the universe, it has seemed that it points beyond itself to a source
which is non-physical and of great intelligence and power,” Lennox brilliantly
summarized in his earlier book, “God’s Undertaker: Has Science Buried
Darwin’s major oversight
Darwin’s extensive work on the evolution theory, Meyer highlighted the fact
that the famed scientist never spent much time investigating the very genetics
and genesis of the first human life.
presupposed the existence of the first living cell,” Meyer explained. “There is a major discontinuity between
chemical processes that we observe, and what we see in actual living organisms.
complexity gap that is absolutely extraordinary,” he concluded.
This is the
very “gap” that many Christians claim is easily explained through the creative
power of Almighty God.
“Darwin’s Doubt,” can be found .
Lennox’s book, “Seven Days That Divide the World,” can be found .